Search results

Maybe they think you got unlucky in the game of life. If they didn't want to live there they'd move! Perhaps you could explain why you think Argentina have a better claim.

Why is it complex? It was never occupied by the Argentinians. First discovered by the British, and then the French (who gave their bit to Spain). Their only claim is potentially on the basis of geography and if that is to form the basis of international law then maybe they should take over...

Are you sure Bozza hasn't got any contingency plans?

It is no certainty that radiation sickness will get you, certainly not the whole of the UK as you seem to keep suggesting. Radiation is a problem but it will depend which way the wind blows as to which direction it will affect before it eventually settles. You are aware there were people that...

Frightening but that is the biggest bomb made and there was only one of them. Wiki suggests that it weighed 25 tonnes and was 8 metres long and the problem is delivery of the bomb that size, hence only one was made (and subsequently detonated). The US has bombs half that size, still...

You are entitled to an opinion but the problem has been that you have posted nothing to support your comments. Also, how do you claim to be in the consensus, where is your evidence that the majority of the public want to get rid of our nuclear capability? The opinion polls I've seen suggest...

Absolute rubbish.

. Think I've found the article. It's a fair point but it seems nigh on impossible to get a definitive cost. The article refers to people travelling abroad for treatment but the question that would need to be answered is whether that treatment is covered by the NHS, ie is it cosmetic for...

Are you deliberately missing the point that was made earlier? What you have posted is about a nuclear war where there would be widespread attacks on mulitple targets. The scenario made previously was one bomb on London and the question was how much that would affect. Your response was that it...

Link doesn't seem to work!

That may be the case but he will still likely to be unelectable as those in the middle will not vote for him.

It probably wouldn't but with a very conservative estimate of £2b it would go a little way to helping. http://www.spectator.co.uk/2015/08/to-defend-the-nhs-stop-health-tourism/

:facepalm: Try posting some evidence to support that assertion.

That shows the blast radius for 100,000 kt bomb but the biggest ever built was only 50,000kt, the so called Tsar Bomb and only one of those was ever actually built and detonated in Russia.

Since when was the defence budget out of control? You're introducing an element that doesn't currently exist to support your argument. I don't think anyone will disagree that the immediate threat is from terrorism which I believe is under the remit of intelligence services and the Police, not...

Fact is that nuclear weapons are not a concept. The knowledge to build them cannot be erased. Of course it would be brilliant if you could eradicate that knowledge and all sides agreed to get rid of their arsenal. As for the deterrent capabilities, look at the middle east. It is widely...

He's not saying that. He's saying the missiles will be conventional warheads.

Where the hell did you read that? I think you've been had by the scaremongers! One missile will not kill all in the UK. If the situation escalated then we might be killed by other missiles but one will not be enough. .

If he sent a bomb to London, I doubt that that would affect us unless the prevailing winds sent the cloud our way. The point I was making that if only one side has them then that side has a considerable advantage. If they chose to expand their borders there is nothing we can do. The fact that...

Then I can only conclude you are an idiot. Nobody in their right mind wants to use nuclear weapons but the fact is that we have them and you cannot simply erase the knowledge of how to build them. We could unilaterally give them up and hide under the umbrella of the US and their arsenal. What...