Search results

He says he wants people to forget it but until people know for certain he isn't pursuing action they won't. Instead of playing games with valid questions, why doesn't he just say, the case is in the hands of his solicitors to pursue or that he has dropped the claim.

Exactly. This isn't about loss of earnings but probably the fact that there should have been a sizeable payoff. When you terminate a contract you would normally be expected to pay the remaining value of the contract unless there are valid grounds for the termination. The club obviously think...

No they didn't. Gus appealed under the clubs own procedures which meant his case was heard by other directors but with the same conclusion. He was sacked. It has, as far as anyone is aware, not progressed beyond that.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2384322/Gus-Poyet-Brighton-court-sacking.html http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23568921 However, it would appear that he hasn't taken any action as yet. My understanding of Employment Tribunals is that you have 3 months from the time of...

This, although I wouldn't put it so colourfully!!! They gambled on Di Canio with no premiership track record so why would they risk it on Poyet as well?