Search results

Of course it doesn't make it Ok, it just makes a law banning something not actually that useful (as a method of prevention) when it comes to people who are willing to break the law.

Guns are banned in this country. If a ban on guns can't prevent gun crime in this country, it would never stand a chance in the US. Gun crime saw 6,694 recorded offences in the 12 months ending September 2017, and we have some of the strictest gun laws in the world...

He was prohibited from shooting people, that's against the law, he still did it though.

I don't get it, would you have preferred the school resource officer to have been prohibited from carrying a firearm? Surely then the gunman would have been able to kill countless people before he was stopped, instead he was the only fatality. Surely that's a good thing?