I understand the phrase, you can't win a match without taking 20 wickets. However you can't win a game without producing runs either, if you have a poor batting line up then you put pressure on your bowlers and can't set the attacking fields to take those wickets. I think only now are people...
Do they? Bowlers only win matches with scores behind them to bowl to attacking fields. The Little Master was the best, everyone within cricket has said that. There's no argument really.
:facepalm:
I can't believe this, I clicked on the thread expecting The Little Master to have 95-100% of the vote. Good job the peple within cricket treat him with the respect he deserves.