Search results

Ha ! yes as well as /bhafc which is squatted by a fan but mostly innocuous - there's a few like that, deliberately designed to deceive, as well.

Yes as discussed earlier on in the thread. There is an Albion fan, or someone who behaves like an Albion fan, who uses the BHAFC account name. https://twitter.com/bhafc I think the "delete" is because the club did have "Official Bhafc" as their user name (i think) but have now, reverted to...

Agreed. Lots of clubs do this but i quite like the simple, fast retro approach of getting the line up out there in text. Also other clubs do fancy stuff with the line up (gifs, videos even) which is hard to read on a mobile, load on 3G etc when you're at the ground or on your way.

On Twitter you have two names ; A user name and an account name. Albion's is currently username: BHAFC and account name: @OfficialBHAFC Liverpool is : Liverpool FC and lfc Palace is : Crystal Palace FC & CPFC Some users on this thread and on twitter have been asking for Brighton to do the same...

if the owner of the account doesn't want to give it up the club have 2 choices - ignore it - or make a claim about the account breaking twitter's terms of use for fan accounts. They have a legitimate case, i think, of arguing that it does indeed break the rules although twitter tend to apply...

Not this one. Its a fair enough question if you use Twitter. .

The tick / verified status does that. Club probably do have a legitimate case that the account breaks Twitter's rules if a) they are that concerned - its not that much of an issue - /bhafc doesn't tweet much etc. b) can argue that #bhafc belongs to them as a name - *which they could...