Search results

Destroy the whole breed - that applies to those who actually want to 'own' them and the dogs themselves. Or, allow me to carry a machete...and a gun....a big gun.

Can responsible non-dog owners apply for exemption, so they don't get killed?

Really? Supply me the means and I'll happily take 100 of them out of the equation. Only need another 1000 like-minded folk and it's done.

Plenty of responsible dog owners, but no-one can be considered 'responsible' for choosing to own one of those beasts.

Tbh, I would omit the 'almost' - everyone who wants one of these IS a bellend, without question.

Sorry dog lovers, but they all, without exception, need to be put down. Blame the twats that breed/want and own them. They are simply too dangerous.

Nowhere near good enough. Just ban anyone from owning one at all.

Another person killed by these beasts. Madness to allow people to have such creatures. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-68197109

The absolute state of that lot. I wouldn't trust them with a budgie.

Nope, best rely on whatever comes to hand, apparently. Perhaps an old burger box or a shoe.... That was my previous point (albeit made a 'little' in jest) - as an individual, I am not allowed to carry anything for self-defence (and tbh I have no wish to do so), yet these things are allowed on...

Nope, but I have had one in the past. Why are you so into being 'protected' by one of these beasts? What are you afraid of that you need protection? Are they taking the place of a gun, for you?

If people continue to be allowed to have these (potential) killing machines, unmuzzled, in public, even on a lead, then I should be afforded the allowance of carrying a machete/handgun in order to protect myself, should I be attacked by one of these monstrosities. I say this slightly tongue in...