Search results

could read the arguements recorded (which is already what most probably do). i dont believe theres as much debate as we'd like to think, more statements of positions for the record. MPs will hold view and rarely change, as noted theres the whip as well. we'd best start there with reform.

i acknowledge its a possible solution to the initial problem, if there's willingness to make this temporay state permanent.

of course, my man in the FO is quite enjoying it. its what made me think of it.

thats some nice lipstick on a pig of a solution. following this they should move EU parliament round all the members, with the presidency, for full sense of inclusion. back to the UK, we could rotate between Holyrood, Cardiff and Belfast. still that problem of the ministries and the...

thats a very good point, a lot more cost than simply a parliament building. and thats a terrible example of unnecessay increase of cost and bureaucracy, and they dont have the many ministries to consider.

overlooks there is more to parliament and being an MP than debates and voting. more goes on in the committees, and theres the constituency work to be done.

the bubble will simply move with it. i dont buy the idea moving parliament will spread wealth or change policy. most MPs are from outside London and the South East, they can be influencing parliament as it is, those issues are not due to location parliaments. im not even sure the finances do...

i look forward to it.

billions are spent on trying to maintain a world heritage site, it would be maintained at great cost regardless of its use. im not sure what anyone thinks will be gained by moving the captial to the midlands or elsewhere, it will still contain politicans and various lobbying groups buzzing around.

reduce social distaning to 1m, can be implemented immediatly.