Search results

that was over enthusiastic media and politicans. the medical world knew and said the difference, the nuance didn't get into mainstream information. its easily forgotten the AZ vaccine efficacy was higher than hoped, then Pfizer was even better.

because animals are where novel viruses emerge from. there were similarities to known bat infections. even if its come from a lab, likely some animal origin processed there.

nothing you've wrote there has any bearing on the nature of gene therapy or its application in mRNA. every single thing could be completely correct and still doesnt change the basic science. this is how you are being misinformed, tickled with little peices of truth or half truth, then told...

the technology used for gene therapy (cutting and splicing genes) is the same as that used to create the mRNA. you hear what you want to hear from the clip, its pretty clear he's refering to the acceptance of the technology concept. gene therapy is where you remove some cells, alter the DNA...

will pick on one point, the mRNA gene therapy. seems to come from idea the RNA in the vaccine is modified, it does not change your genes. this simply not understanding what gene therapy is or does, then calling others an idiot. could debunk all the other points, its sad really how so much...