Search results

where they arent present they will need to be provided, still under the NHS. the plans are put forward by regional NHS (written by NHS managers) to reorganise healthcare from expensive hospitals to alternatives, also targeting preventive care. i dont know why this gets interpreted as the end of...

based on what? why should plans to change how serivices are delivered mean lead to conclusion the NHS is being dismantled?

1% NI currently raises about £10bn, but you look at some estimates and there needs to be 2-4 times that. dont know what they means to your income, maybe be more or less than £40. £40 would be an awful lot for many. 1% on NI would be fair too all, probably about time upper earnings had higher...

probably in the same place it is, as apparently government and DoT is driving the reform to DOO most problems on the network come from lack of funding in the publicly owned rail infrastructure. back to the subject, how about we stop having an instant aversion to non-publicly owned healthcare...

wonder how many people will not bother with the summary there, and only read the BBC peice, and from that make all sorts of misguided assumptions about this? the other week a thread here had a theme that we need reform how we fund and how we deliver healthcare, this report is looking at that...