thanks. i think the confusion comes from a perception that "safe standing" means return to terracing, removal of seats, as can be seen from some of the survey's refered to on that page. then "they" start talking about reducing capacity to make this area safe, so it costs more (because fewer...
we already have safe standing if only the legislation allowed, we can simply stand in front of our allocated seat. i dont understand why the approach isnt to allow a change to the law so that areas can be designated "standing" seats, so that those that wish to stand through the match are...