Search results

it absolutely is religious. its down to an interpretation of how seriously and literally a particular religious tenet, preserving modesty, should be taken. most anomalies in religion are the same, because the stupid books where written 2000 years ago, and different people want to use the text...

unless you're a muslim, right?

i would say they could do alot better than "encourage" by jettisoning the Old part, as im aware some evangelical groups do. makes for a much "nicer" religion with out all that anti-xyz carp. those keeping it in the text imply they believe it is important to the religion and the teaching.

:lolol: using common sence would tell anyone to simply dismiss the whole shebang as nothing more than a bunch of folk tales and allegories. the authors of those text intended them to be taken literally, and the original christian churches expected one to follow both texts (they came in one...

what utter horse crap. New Testament is a new series of teaching, not a rewrite of the previous series. both testaments are considered as canon by the vast majority of christians churches. the fact that they are often inconsistent with each other and the Old series teaches stuff we dont...

dont be such a cretin, you cant take a 4 year period and extroplate out to 50 years. why does the sample stop at 2008? is it because since then there hasnt been the same rate? or its just bad data, because its not consistant with the census for a start. while we can hope, a thousand years...