Search results

Aah. Thank you for clarifying that. It was news to me.

Excuse my ignorance but I thought the club owned the ground on which the Amex is built. So why are we paying rent?

I don't doubt that they have been paid but they are hardly world beaters and won't have made much of a dent in our sales figure.

I know we need to be prudent but if we're to be competitive in the Championship we're going to have to invest in some quality players whether we like it or not. It is possible to invest in players as well as bricks and mortar.

I thought Toko and the Spanish fella were free transfers, and that Lingard was funded by MU?

Forgot about him but I'm sure you can see where I'm coming from.

Why minus the £2.5M paid? Is that not what accountants call a sunk cost?

... Leo, Bridcutt and Barnes and only £500K spent so far on Chris O'Grady. By my reckoning, therefore, even if the club want to retain half this income we must still have a sizeable pot available for signings. The question is can we and will we spend it? Let's hope the club have some big...