Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. Weststander

    [Albion] Penalties chaos - Clattenburg & G.Neville clear it up

    Good post. Attackers diving is low risk / potentially high reward.
  2. Weststander

    [Albion] Penalties chaos - Clattenburg & G.Neville clear it up

    I'm not saying it was or wasn't a pen, but there was an alternative for Ronaldo. An alternative that was the norm in the first 130 years of football, until the post-Klinsmann era of "going to ground". For CR to use his power, reactions and balance to beat the slight coming together, and go on...
  3. Weststander

    [Albion] Penalties chaos - Clattenburg & G.Neville clear it up

    "Whoever initiates contact" is the fouler.
  4. Weststander

    [Albion] Penalties chaos - Clattenburg & G.Neville clear it up

    Because it was their beau CR?
  5. Weststander

    [Albion] Penalties chaos - Clattenburg & G.Neville clear it up

    Agree with you. But do you feel like we're swimming against the new tide of opinion? Even old school players who would've confronted a diver, like Shearer and all the others, justify all pen winning dives with: "A challenge the defender didn't need to make" "Well there was contact" "Naive by...
  6. Weststander

    [Albion] Penalties chaos - Clattenburg & G.Neville clear it up

    Great analysis then on ITV, explaining on how decisions should be decided every time. If the attacker initiates contact, for example by dangling a leg out to touch the defender, it's a foul by them and should be a freekick to the defending team. A simple as that. In reverse, a penalty. NOT...
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here