Search results

If that's true, it's embarrassing. Disregard for innocent until proven guilty brigade.

Same thoughts exactly about the renamed management tool. Before I escaped to work for myself, I briefly saw that dribble. Not needed in the 'management' of a professional in a unique roll, such as @HWT.

I remember that well. The kangeroo court of public opinion found him guiity, fuelled by a media scrum to harrass the bloke. In a different era, (check the 10 Rillington Place case), he may even have been charged. He was a little eccentric, unmarried, had been a private teacher, had tenants...

They should pay you handsomely and praise you to the hilt in the annual SWOT appraisal.

The wealthy victims of phone hacking received huge payouts. I'm glad they did. Wealth isn't a cap on damages.

A strange apology, the type a bullying former boss used to give to his victims later on with "I'm sorry that you felt upset by .... ". Not "I'm sorry for my behaviour". This will now spend further time and licence payers money going through higher tiers of the legal system.

They better. They're so quick to jump on any other entity or individual who's imperfect in political, business or public life.

Following the trial early on, the judge and barristers seemed to face sleazy arrogance and resistance, like extracting teeth, from a couple of the key BBC protagonists. No contrition, even slightest of regrets, compassion.

Being honest, I didn't. Thank you letting me know the truth. My view of the BBC on the whole saga remains the same - very poor, with a News of the World approach to journalism.

Really pleased for him. The grandstanding BBC, after receiving a snide call from the Police, sent an expensive helicopter up and fuelled his trial by public opinion. Mud sticks and all that. After the Savile scandal, it seemed that the Police and BBC went to the other extreme.