Search results

... never like the word accussing... I was just clarifying what i said (i think).

Agree regards squad management and that it not desirable to be dependent on a loanee but I don't think they should be written off as an option either. dare I say it Palace probably did not go down last season because of Gallagher , it gave them time and another year in PL to get a replacement...

I guess it's all about how the club spends its money. We had signed Gilmour before Mwepu retired so there is a 'vacancy' not sure if the new 17 year old fills that or is development. If we want to upgrade on Gilmour we will need to pay £15-20million as a minimum unless we are lucky. So question...

Football is all about the 'what might happen if / has happened because'' its not a science its a lottery ....

Not dismissing him at all - I would rather keep him and play him... I know its still early for Undav but he really has not looked to on the pace. I arrived late on Sunday so never saw the subs ... I would have played him as the sub for Wellbeck....

Not sure about these 'outs' . Think Sarmiento would have been on for Lallana had he been fit., I don't going out on loan won't improve his fitness. I think Billy G has to stay to prove recruitment did not get it wrong. Regards Ferguson he seems to have dropped out of our first team squad so...

Especially when we might have to pay £20m for a replacement.

Possibly best player on Sunday and very talented so keeping him on loan for a year means we have CB cover for the year and don't have to spend cash on a CB in january. What happens the following year - maybe we go for another years loan if he looks like he is developing ok I am sure Chelsea...

The guy was probably our best player on Saturday ( agree not a lot of competition) and if Chelsea come in for Trossard we could try to get him as some for of part exchange (yes i know that does not happen much now) but no harm in asking.