Search results

Thought that was what I said in the last line (I believe now that he wasn't defending, simply observing). :thumbsup:

I understand the way multinationals operate (I've worked for a few and been involved in profit/loss and tax obligations for them), I just wondered why Beach Hut was defending them taking on their obligations, morally or legally. (I believe now that he wasn't defending, simply observing).

Nice quote - fat fingers syndrome :wink: But you still seem to be trying to justify why these companies shouldn't pay the tax they are liable for ?

But this whole conversation started because when i asked why they shouldn't pay tax, you said that we have to look at the bigger picture and they employ people who pay tax. In what way does this justify them not paying the tax they are liable for ?

I'm not sure that listing more multinationals who don't pay their tax is an answer to the question ?

Why on earth would you want to find ways to help them avoid paying their tax liabilities ?

So employing people is justification for not paying tax ?

Always stuns me how the first to rush to defend these, at best immoral and, at worst illegal activities, are always people who are quite happy to pay their full tax obligations, often under PAYE ???