It's much like the two posters this thread is about. You're saying that they've had enough chances, and they don't contribute to the football part of the forum, so when they next troll they'll be banned. For clarity, I don't disagree with you, but you are also playing the man and not the ball...
I think quite a lot of us fall into a third camp - those that post here when times are good or bad are decent rivals to have. Just as I'd rather have a beer and chat with a Palace fan in a pub than some southern Manure fan. If Palace do well and someone like Mr Putdown or loz (I think, apologies...
He's been accused of having a homophobic signature, he hasn't (or at least hadn't) denied it or removed it, so he posts here with people believing he's being homophobic. In terms of where should the line be drawn, who else is doing something like that? If a poster here is shown to be being...
You could equally say that about the two people Bozza is referring to, if people have a problem they can just ignore them. But if you add them to an ignore list, a conversation between them and others goes on it makes the thread less readable. If it's the mod's decision that specific away fans...
Ok. Well I know which posters he's referring to, but Dougie does also fall into the category of only being here to do all the things Bozza listed, just not in a racist way (did he ever justify his homophobic signature on the BBS?)
I thought that was the entire point of Bozza's post? It's possible to stay on right side of the line, because one post on it's own will not break the rules. Bozza said "If you make a habit of writing in a way that largely seeks to diminish, belittle, undermine, divide, discriminate and mock then...
Dougie isn't nasty on here, but appears to have a homophobic signature on the Palace board, and only ever comes here when they're doing well and we're not. Bozza's post says "If you make a habit of writing in a way that largely seeks to diminish, belittle, undermine, divide, discriminate and...