Search results

****ing shit decision. More like a yellow for Morales's (second) barge.

Yeah, but he also did well in Europe. And on top of that, he's stood out as their best player, but wasn't good enough to make our starting 11, which is different to us buying from Scotchland in the hope we've got a star.

Well firstly it's possible that those of us who feel he's worth more are wrong. But if we're right, then no one else was interested because: there's a limited market of teams that can both pay more than that also guarantee first team football and other teams don't always realise how good a...

Using that logic you don't think anyone has ever been over or under-sold.

Because we've seen him play a lot more than they have.

But selling for more that £3m now wouldn't have meant we couldn't also have a sell on clause on top of that. And yes he needs to play, he needs experience and exposure, but are we definitely holding on to Dunk for the next 2 years? He could have had game time and exposure via a loan, the way...

I'm not sure many of us would have liked to see him forced to stay, but I'd have liked a fair price (which I don't think we got), unless we let him go at a discount but with a buy-back clause, which I'd be very happy about. That would have suited both clubs and Connor. Making money on the deal...

I thought he was better than Hünemeier (maybe as I was taking his potential into account), and actually better than Duffy too, but different, and not what we needed alongside Dunk as much as Duffy.