Search results

No it doesn't. Both adults committed a crime. The one the driver committed (filming) did not affect Jamie. Thousands of people commit crimes every day, I can't get interested in them all. I'm not interested in the driver other than to say that he committed a crime and should be prosecuted. I am...

Something I haven't disagreed with. Why is it faux outrage? There's nothing fake about it. I've not defended the guy with the camera. I will never have to see him again so I don't really care about him. I will see Jamie though, on the tv I like to watch, and I pay his wages, so obviously I'm...

I agree with that. Surely leaning out of the window to gob into another person's car is also dangerous driving? Why were emotions running high? Jamie didn't play in the game, it wasn't that big of a game. He was an idiot and has no right to behave like that. Then what's your point? It's Jamie...

IMO he should be charged. What's your point? No I'm not. You said there is always another side, whether you agree with it or not. What exactly is Jamie's side? I've read his response and there's nothing in there that comes close to an excuse or justification for what he did.

Yeah, I just wish Savile was still with us to tell us his side.

Was it written by Jamie's legal team? "No matter how famous or familiar from TV they are, they are not our plaything, they are not our cue for banter and we need to be more understanding of others and less desperate to become a YouTube hero. I can’t believe this even needs saying." We? Speak...

Linekar has tweeted photos of his member?

Seems to apply to his second tweet: 'He's apologised and is clearly contrite. Sure he'll be back soon and rightly so'.

I bet it's great sitting near you though, you probably hand out free bananas.

From that: SH: I’m recoiling watching that, it’s disgusting. How do you feel watching that? JC: “Exactly the same, really. You can’t obviously condone that behaviour in any way, shape or form, no matter where you are, who you’re representing – obviously at Sky Sports now, my family and the most...

Well indeed, that makes it worse. But even if they hadn't, you'd just be too embarrassed to go and see them, you'd send a message and maybe a bottle of wine saying you're sorry. Imagine actually going up to them - hi, you took the piss out of me, I spat in your daughter's face, nice to meet you...

It gets worse. Imagine you'd done what Jamie's done. Pretty hard for me to imagine, I've never spat on anyone I can't imagine I ever will, but if I'd done what he'd done I'd apologise (like he has) and hope a hole in the ground opens up to swallow me. The last thing I'd want to do is go and...

Well we don't know for certain, but the way the conversation goes it seems quite clear that that's the first time they've spoked to each other. There could have been some hand gestures before, but even that looks unlikely, and if it was the case, why would Jamie put his window down? Just...

Maybe you're right, I just think fans look up to pundits too, and if they can behave like that, why shouldn't kids?

He's not apologised because he thinks it was the wrong thing to do, he's apologised because he's been told he has to if he wants to keep his snout in the trough. He's a role model. I think he should go.

Pretty sure it should be role mate. :whistle:

So what if they made hand signals? He didn't have to wind his window down, I disagree. 1) He's not a good man, he's a scumbag 2) Livelihood? The money he needs to feed and clothe his family? He's worth many millions, I think they'll survive.

They? No, he claims others had said something, but not the people in this car. And "2-1 mate" is hardly the biggest insult. He doesn't even play for Liverpool any more FFS. When we leave a game after a loss and the away fans on the train wind us up (not a regular occurrence, but does happen) do...

Just watching the video again now (link at the bottom). I don't agree that it was simply spun that way. He didn't simply acknowledge that it goes on: "Is that third party ownership a problem though" Sam - "It’s not a problem" ... Sam - "Third party ownership is only banned in this country" [and...

That doesn't sound right. One of the reporters said suggested something that broke the rules, and BFS said something like 'You can't say that, I didn't hear that' etc. I'm sure it wasn't simply 'can you talk for us?'