Search results

I insult you because you ignore all efforts to explain things to you, as I will now repeat: You suggest that all I offer is my opinion that is was a foul, but: So you see BG, it's not just what I thought is it. The evidence you're providing is that a panel hasn't said he now needs to be banned...

You're an idiot. It would be easier to explain the space time continuum to my cocker spaniel than get anything through your thick closed skull.

You want the impossible.

Even if he didn't take his eyes off the ball, it's still a reckless foul, because he didn't need to look to know where Schelotto would be when the ball was circa 7 feet off the ground - obviously he'd be where the ball was. He shoulder charged that position, and predictably wiped Schelotto out...

Leaving that game I assumed it was a 50/50 challenge and an accidental clash of heads. This is nothing to do with tinted specs. I realised it wasn't 50/50 and wasn't an accidental clash of heads when I saw all the replays. I wince when I see the replays because it's so bad. Even Dermot 'back up...

I think that could be our clubs view of it. Our game is done, let Arsenal be at full strength against our rivals. As things currently stand, I don't really agree with that view for 2 reasons. Firstly, I think we should complain when our players are on the wrong end of bad challenges, as I don't...

Have you seen all the sky footage? There you can see that before Kolasinac gets to the ball, he throws is shoulder into it. Doing that is going to cause trouble. Even if you haven't seen that, you agree that Kolasinac didn't get the ball right? So he was late to the challenge, and wiped out...

Worrying.

I don't think we should assume that. That's not true, as I believe all 3 members of the panel need to agree, so 2 out of 3 may have felt it should have been red, and the other may have thought it should be yellow. All of them may have thought the player should have been sent off, but under the...

They were your words not mine :)

Likewise, but he's not annoying me enough to care. If you're happy to be banned because of him though, perhaps you should make an exception.

Simmo, why don't you put him on your ignore list?

I don't think so. Incidents can be reported, but the panel don't look at everything that the ref hasn't acted on, or that the ref may have got wrong. They may have looked at this incident, I don't know. What I do know, is that he should have been sent off. Have you looked at the Sky footage much?

Sure, but he had no idea what happened.

:kiss: I'm sorry if I've given anyone the impression that you're the nasty piece of work that I am :)

And there's your problem.

I agree with you that the view of 2 refs doesn't in itself make it the correct view. However, you're suggesting that a panel not correcting the decision makes that the correct view. 1) I'm not sure a panel has looked at it. 2) Even if they have, it's possible that 2 out of 3 thought it was a...

It's a joke, people can see you didn't say it.

The only ref I know of that's commented on it is Dermot Gallagher, and he said the player should have been sent off. Fair point. Could someone post a link to where it shows this was being looked at by a panel of refs? * note, Papa Laz should have said that, but he held back and said a milder...

Wow. For Dermot to go against the decision on the day shows just how clear it was. Not that I didn't already know it was a clear red.