Search results

I think it's a fair criticism when the winners have spent a lot more than anyone else. What's in City's favour is that they haven't spent a lot more than Man U and Chelsea, but they are a lot better.

Not sure why you're repeating yourself. I guess I'll repeat my answer: No they wouldn't. But they haven't spent vast amounts more than the likes of Man U and Chelsea, and they are vastly better.

:glare:

Too early for that, we may need 3 points.

They'd be nowhere. But they haven't spent vast amounts more than the likes of Man U and Chelsea, and they are vastly better.

We're going to face the backlash