Search results

Where's the fun in that?

So none of us need any sort of legal understanding, we just need common sense, and everything will be fine?

You don't need to deny it for it to stay as speculation. Beckham never denied the allegations against him, but as he didn't confirm them the media said that they always had to say 'allegedly'. That led me to believe that it wasn't libelous if you said 'allegedly', but I've been corrected on that...

But those comments don't stop something being libelous.

Not only a ****, but a cheat, a con man, a thief, a fraudster, among many other things.

That's fine, because it's been proven to be true.

Well I guess most source are impeachable. And I imagine most allegations are far removed from the original source. I would say that within our local, there will be some examples where the source is not so remote. Yep, understood. Indeed, perfectly understandable. I think many of us don't really...

I think even if you have factual basis for the latter, NSC would rather you didn't post it.

We can call each other ***** though, right? You can call me a **** and you may even get a large number of witnesses to testify on your behalf, but in court a medical doctor would probably disagree. Ok, maybe not, I'm probably a bad example, but you know what I mean.

But that's not NSC Titanic, and I don't really think Bozza would want the place to be like that. If we were all just perfectly polite about everyone and everything this would be a very different forum.

A thread has just been removed from NSC, which I guess is due to concern over possibly libelous content. Separately on NSC I was pulled up on something possibly libelous the other day. Could we have some guidelines on what we are and aren't allowed to say?