Search results

I'd know that I'd declined because I couldn't be asked, so I wouldn't have broken the law, but I might still be found guilty of breaking it. You'd don't have to later accept another on the same day to be found guilty, as you know law is never that straight forward. If the couple feel they've...

Our Prime Minister is a woman. Seems like this is being made up as we go along.

So it's ok to have a men only rule, or is that discriminating?

Indeed it doesn't. But it is.

Great tag line. The market doesn't sort things out though, not in the early stages of stopping discrimination. It makes things more expensive for the minority groups and gives people the idea that it's ok to discriminate, and you end up with Australia.

I can certainly see the point of view of a minority group that suffers inequality, they shouldn't have to worry about whether someone will provide their standard service just because they're gay.

I don't know why the women only sessions are allowed. As a wedding photographer I know that you can't turn down gay couples (not that I'd want to anyway).

They can't, it's against the law

So it's ok for companies to advertise for straight people only?