Search results

So there is a bit of inconsistency with the rules - it depends on where the ball goes as to whether a live offence has been committed. Instead, the rules are more along the lines of having a punishment, but not too much.

Bit of devils advocate here - if the penalty is not scored, an indirect free-kick is awarded to the defending team. According to your definition, the encroachment has been made when the game is not live. Perhaps it's more that when the ball is struck, the game is live, and the other attacking...

Seriously?

That's also wrong if the defending side commits the infringement and the attacking team had scored - the goal stands, not retaken.

Bless you BG. We all make mistakes.

Well they didn't have a goal disallowed, the had a penalty retake disallowed. So add them to the long list of teams who've been denied a penalty. At least it didn't cost them any points.

Yeah, but BG has been doing it his way for 60 years, therefore he is right.

So, just to confirm, it's sams dad's problem, right?

Indeed, going to be watching with the kids. Well, at least with my daughter, son might get bored.

PC isn't near the TV, so I'm not helping, I'll be gloooood to the TV.

:lol:

You are missing something.