Search results

If his argument is that they could have put out a stronger team, and that they could have won had they put out a stronger team, you don't need to disagree with that point. It may be his opinion that it was a shit team compared to their normal first choice team, but in the context of a game...

"You are right, that team is full of quality and should have won." But I don't agree with this: because NEVER is too long a time frame and there's always a chance that a team could lose. :lol: Like you say, he's a knuckle dragging Chelsea supporting Neanderthal. He's lost all perspective on...