Search results

Because it makes it harder for us to compete with them.

I'd be more bothered if other clubs weren't after our players. And rumours are just that and fairly meaningless. We have a decent budget and will put a decent squad together. The only real concern I have - and it's a big one - is the number of clubs on parachute payments, combined with the...

It would depend what replacements we can get. I'd want to actually get the replacements first.

As if Sunderland would let him go for that. He was one of their best players when they finished the season well.

You've moved the goal posts!

I want that bet!

You think that if Barnes and Ulloa are in the PL next season, Barnes will score more?

It isn't irrelevant - the point is simply that you don't just 'get rid' of a player if they say they want to move on - in Ulloa's case, to play in the top division. Yep, that's a lot of money, and I could understand if we took it. Accepting a high offer is not the same as getting rid though.

If you were a Liverpool fan, would you have said that about Suarez last summer? Letting players go straight away is not always a good idea for the club.