Search results

It is true Buzzer

Quite. In both cases the situation was already under control. He just came steaming in for reasons of his own. The high-five said it all. No problem whatsoever with the conduct of any other steward yesterday, but maybe that guy should be sent to watch over the Park and ride or something. If his...

Just sticking up for the underdog matey. Don't believe a sappy pitch-invader who is undoubtedly in the wrong and who has been duly apprehended bang-to-rights and who will no doubt be given a ban and/or fine should then be attacked by a pumped-up psychotic cuuunt for no other reason than he was...

At least one H Blocker of my acquaintance did exactly that :thumbsup:

Bollocks. He was put in an unneccessary arm-lock by a psycho who jogged at least twenty metres for no other reason than to try out his arm-lock skills on a sappy bloke who was already being wimpily led off by two non-psycho stewards who had the situation completely under control. There is NO...

Mate. We appreciate your Wenger-like 'did not see the incident in question' stance. But we know you KNOW the inclinations of the cuuuuunt in question. You KNOW he was out of order. Fact.

So it's fair game for a pyschotic steward to abandon his post and sprint twenty yards just to try out his best arm-breaking moves on a sappy bloke who is already being lightly restrained by a couple of more reasonable stewards and who is no threat to anyone at all?

No problem. It was the same with both incidents. Both were nicely under control and all credit to the stewards on the spot for that. Last thing you needed was that cuuuunt in the shades to come steaming in and inflame matters. Get rid. Before he hurts someone.

OK, fair enough, in your last dozen posts you've consistently distanced yourself from the actions of your colleague. We take the hint.

Oh, don't worry mate, it's ALL on camera - with also plenty of eye-witnesses to the heavy-handedness of one psychotic cuuunt who should not be allowed anywhere near the spectators of a sporting event.

No it's NOT 'end of story'. The initial stewards on the scene behaved impeccably. The guy in the shades was late on the scene in the case of both encroachments, when both were well under control, and was just getting his personal gratification. He needs kicking out of the club. Absolutely no...

Some say the second person got pushed over the hoardings. Some say he tried to get on the pitch. Either way, like I say, that cuuunt in the shades ran a very long way to get involved in something that was already well under control. If that cuuunt's still employed by the club next season, then...

That cuuunt in the shades is a complete and utter psycho. Dress it up however you like, but if you are defending his actions then you are in the wrong, pure and simple. On both encroachments the situation was well under control and the guy waded in for his own private kicks.

The boy that run on at the end was undoubtedly in the wrong. Two weedy stewards had him well under control and he was being led away. Then that psychotic KRUNT in the shades came steaming in, WAY too late to add anytrhing to the proceedings, and proceeded to put the poor sap invader in a lock...