Search results

Which report? The one where the sex workers were brought in later in the evening? Is it accepatable to tell a waitress to take her knickers off and dance on the table? Listen to the interview. It's just life? It might be in some people's lives, but not the vast majority who aren't...

The charities handing money back isn't completely unmentioned in this thread, because I mentioned it.

She performed as Marily Monroe. Performance usually denotes an act. She did not say she was a waitress or hostess.

It's so disheartening, isn't it. It's ok for women and men to be sexual objects.

The truth is that the Presidents Club has disbanded very rapidly, the PM is trying to stop gagging orders on the papers, so there are men who are running scared. But that's ok according to you, because one dancer on a stage said it was ok. So did David Walliams, who was also on the stage. The...

Yes, but she wasn't waitressing or hostessing. She would have gone on the stage, did her Marilyn Monroe impression and then left, Completely different job.

This is the interview, watch it to the end. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-42799595/undercover-reporter-hostesses-groped-at-men-only-event

She wasn't a waitress nor a hostess. She did an act as Marilyn Monroe.

There's only you and dingodan who keep repeating it was only holding hands and hands on the back. He is even trying to say the women called that sexual harassment.

I saw both items and the early evening news item was a lot shorter. You are defending the indefensible.

Read the FT article, in full, not what you want to read. Number 10 is already investigating gagging clauses as some businessmen are trying to cover their tracks...

That was the whole point of the article. If you only saw the early evening tv news, it was sanitized for family viewing. The intereview I saw with the journalist stated the whole range of assaults, suggestions and harassment. The FT article also does that. Why are you trying to demean an...

Hurray! Well called out. Read back through the thread, and the women were pimping themselves, knew what they were doing (despite some being described as students) but the men were just old farts and enjoying themselves. Dual standards indeed.

So, they were asking for itt, were they? The men are not to blame in any way shape or form?

Tosh. Stop trying to demean the article. See my post #181 with direct quotes from the article in the FT. You're getting desperate now, trying to say it was just one woman or one man. A wealthy club which has been running for 33 years has fallen apart because of one incident? Incredulous.

I would stake my life on that being written by a man.

The whole article was about sexual harassment. The writer has said it went way beyound a hand around the waist and a hand touch. But according to you, the girls were pimping themselves, because they were told to wear black underwear...

Good sense and reason? Oh come off it! This would've been sleazy decades ago. I can remember an old school friend of mine being hired to jump out of a cake at the Metropole wearing a skimpy costume. As pointed out, look but don't touch is/was definitely the order of the day then, as it...

The Presidents Club has disbanded due this uncorroberated article. Straight away. A club which has been running for 33 years, suddenly disbanded because of some tittle tattle in a paper? https://www.ft.com/content/29ee70f6-011d-11e8-9650-9c0ad2d7c5b5 AN HOUR AGO 1 Less than 24 hours...