Search results

Ahem.

He did, as the Argus confirmed it. He didn't want to be cup tied if offers came in. It was dealt with and he was ready to play at Fulham.

Good.

You can't compare a workplace with a football contract. If a firm had offered me three times my wages, I would simply give my notice in. Players cannot do that.

Comparisons with Liam are unfair. It was a League cup game, and he was stripped off ready to enter the pitch just three days later. He's been punished by the club and a line drawn under it. I suspect it was bad advice from his agent.

The club are offering him an improved contract.

Good post.

He's cup tied.

Nsc guesswork. He was stripped off ready to come on at Fulham, but Stephens needed to come off, so JFC went on instead.

He is, but no, he doesn't. If it's true, it was the Southend game, then he didn't want to be cup tied. Hughton isn't too put out about it, as he's kept him in the squad.

For somebody who is allegedly sulking, he put a lot of effort into warming up at Huddersfield. He also went out of his way to collect the loose balls for Nathan Jones, being the last one to leave the pitch before the game.

I quoted the Argus article that he wrote.

Hughton plans to name him in his 18 tonight. Is Andy Naylor 'lying' or Chris Hughton?

I'm sorry, I didn't mean that you'd said it. I was referring to the whole thread. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

Quote from this morning's Argus Summer business could still include the departure of Lewis Dunk but Hughton plans to name him in his 18 tonight and says he will treat transfer speculation as a compliment. Hughton said: “I think we’ve always said any speculation or interest in any of our...