Search results

In a court, I’m pretty sure Derby are f**ked, I’m no legal expert but SURELY you cannot say we’ve sacked this guy for something that in reality is minor in relation compared to the two younger players, age and value is the ONLY reason Keogh has been binned off, had he had no injuries I bet they...

So basically because Keogh is old and has less value he’s being treated far more harshly than a younger player who probably did worse, purely because they have more value? Don’t you see how wrong that is, if you are sacking Keogh for gross misconduct how the hell can you allow the other two...

All irrelevant when you consider they have sacked him for gross misconduct, yet they haven’t dismissed the 2 players who are equally as bad or did even worse simply because they are younger and more valuable to the club? This is an employment Lawyers dream case, Derby will be forced to pay up...

:facepalm: Derby are a laughing stock, enjoy the employment tribunal :lolol: