Search results

That was because some people were assuming Dick Knight's guilt without listening to any evidence. The rumpus on here was between the people who felt Dick Knight had been stupid and should go because he is a crook versus those who wanted to hear the story of the level of Dick Knight's involvement...

So why do you say it was right for some verbal shit to be slung in his direction?

Does this imply you believe Dick Knigt was complicit?

And how much shit did certain individuals want sling in the chairman's direction over that one? :nono: