You're not helping yourself with phrases like 'PC brigade', 'trendy', 'modern thinking', 'liberal guardian reading types' - as if those phrases have any meaning. Your main argument in this instance seems to be you don't like women playing football. Or more obviously, you don't like women...
The alternative being that the club is not doing the right thing. You're saying it shouldn't be done because Tony Bloom will lose a small fortune. Tony Bloom has said he is prepared to weather that. In other words, it's not strictly a business decision, it's more that it's the right thing to do...
That's EXACTLY what they're doing. Keep up.
And football isn't only a 'man's game' - so your main premise is wrong.
Fascinating to see how many people who have no interest in women's football (or indeed are misogynistic enough to believe women have no right to play football - see above) have...
You asked this yesterday with a series of incorrect assumptions - the main one being this impacted on the men's budget.
The women's team has a budget and set-up - from youth through to the first team - approved and financed by Tony Bloom, separate to the men's budget. If he wasn't interested in...
Doubtful.
One - several teams, including the men's first team, women's first team, and U18s (and the REMF match) all play there.
Two - the pitch is awful at the best of times.
Seriously, grow up.
There's nothing 'politically correct' about women's football.
No, no, no. It's vital that he tells everyone how little he knows or cares about women's football, to the point it makes him an expert in women's football.
Not only does he disagree with the notion of women's...
All good stuff - with the exception of playing at Crawley.
This has all been done rather hastily by the FA (IMO), and seeing as, apart from Crawley, Sussex doesn't have a second stadium of 2,000 (with a view to raising it to 6,000) that's available, the club is screwed for a venue. So...