Search results

Who gave you the right to re-write history to suit your own agenda? What you're honking on about there has nothing to do with the reality of what happened. So why post it?

Which is why I'm surprised just three people are being done for perverting the course of justice. Was it really just those three who did that? How much political pressure was brought to bear? It's not as if elements in Westminster didn't know what was going on.

I'd suspect that it would have to be shown that all of the organisations you mentioned would have to be seen to be complicit in their respective negligence. I'm surprised it's as few as six people to be charged (though I suspect it would be more but for the subsequent deaths of those who...

... and also irrelevant to the culpability of the disaster.

Neither of which had any bearing on the disaster. Nor did any perceived ticketlessness. So to not exonerate them isn't just misguided - it's plain wrong.

The 'confined area' if managed properly, was not a key factor - it was a contributing factor. However, seeing as the area wasn't managed properly, that's the key issue, as confirmed by Taylor, the HIP and the Inquest. What evidence do you have that the crowd was 'under the influence of drink'...

Oh, you're grizzling, alright. I haven't insulted you. You must be one hell of a snowflake to think that 'pitiable, pathetic, and devoid of any intelligence' is, in this context, an insult. Meanwhile, do continue to honk your meaningless twaddle based on your knowledge of pre-90s football...

And that has precisely WHAT to do with what happened here? Oh yeah, nothing. Which has been proved by a judge-led inquiry, an independent inquiry, and an inquest. Please, if you have first-hand, peer-tested evidence which shows that 'football fans will turn up drunk and as late as they can'...

Seriously, grow up. You've come on here to 'express an opinion' which is based on lies, and then grizzle when you get called out and shown up. You haven't 'disagreed' with anyone, you've argued with facts, and you're continuing to do so. Considering what you're posting, 'pitiable, pathetic...

However, I will answer your questions (some of which were answered 26 years ago). Alcohol toxicology tests were carried out on all of the deceased - even children. None were found to have had excessive amounts of alcohol within their system. Similarly, no evidence was presented to either Taylor...

He might be entitled to it, but it doesn't follow he's obliged to offer it. As for his 'left wing anti establishment view' comment - pitiable, pathetic, and devoid of any intelligence.

Nah - he's Norman Bettison. It's an extract from his book.

You clearly haven't taken a blind bit of notice in the case over the past 28 years, so why start now? Especially when your meaningless prejudices are showing you up to be some kind of history revisionist. Every question you ask has been answered by due process. The fact you're asking highlights...

Appalling sentiments. Tens of millions of pounds has been spent investigating it, millions of sheets of paper, thousands of written testimonies, inquests and peer-tested evidence has been presented, leading to the conclusion of identifying the culpable and exonerating the innocent. And you...

Because the number of tickets sold roughly tallied with the number of people there. The number of ticketless - no matter how many or how few - isn't the issue. It's the effect any ticketless fans had on the situation. The coroner established (as did Lord Justice Taylor) that the evidence...

Chaos created by the authorities. That much has been proved.

None of which were 'ticketless fans'. You've fabricated your own evidence. The inquiries found no evidence that ticketless fans were a contributing factor. If you can find first-hand, peer-tested evidence, let us know.

You agree with a total lie? You're arguing with facts - and you have no evidence to back your claim up, because none has ever existed. What a stupid thing to agree with.

What ticketless fans? We know you're a serial truth-denier and like to re-write history to suit your own petty agenda, but this is farcical beyond parody. Go and live your fantasies somewhere else.

Six individuals.