Search results

Entirely to do with how the decision was made - conferring with a player before changing your decision is not in the rulebook.

Yeah. It was. But thanks for taking the trouble.

http://www.thefa.com/news/governance/2016/may/charges-hearing-results-suspensions-appeals Have a looksie here tomorrow.

:lolol::lolol::lolol: Yeah, right.

Lancaster Gate IIRC Edit: Wiki says that you are in fact correct.

'There are some things that money can't buy: Promotion isn't one. #RiversideMike'

Have the FA declared who will be their representative at the Euros yet? :whistle:

Yeah! Do it for Deano (don't we hate him, though?)

"Mike Dean is a spineless ****" "Same old FA: Always useless" "There's only one Dale Stephens" etc etc Well at least we know now that it isn't at all important how good or bad a challenge is, the only thing that matters is how injured the player is. Should come in handy...

Stephens or no, we've got this.

Hughts must be blowing a fuse. Best thing we can do is focus on beating Wednesday, then winning the thing on the day. Shove it right up the FA and then get the chance to give Mike Dean hell next season when he refs a game.

He walked past me around 4 on Saturday with his (VERY fit) wife. Didn't look overly concerned with events at the Riverside.