Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. TSB

    Stephens

    Not at Fulham, then?
  2. TSB

    Stephens

    He probably isn't any more: age, fitness etc. But mobile enough to be considered box-to-box I would say. He'll need to be, anyway.
  3. TSB

    Stephens

    Crofts is a ball winning box to box midfielder.
  4. TSB

    Stephens

    Damage, I assume.
  5. TSB

    Stephens

    Comparisons have been drawn to Baldock's injury last season. #lesspositivespin
  6. TSB

    Stephens

    'Sup?
  7. TSB

    Stephens

    Bold shout. Let's see.
  8. TSB

    Stephens

    Oh. I assumed you were joking. Hopefully that info on Bong is spot on.
  9. TSB

    Stephens

    Shame it's entirely fictitious, then!
  10. TSB

    Stephens

    Yep. No words like 'chronic' or 'underlying', thank you very much Dr.
  11. TSB

    Stephens

    All I've heard is that it isn't as minor as first thought. He might still be ok for Saturday (far as I know) but it doesn't sound the 'sure thing' that had been suggested over the weekend.
  12. TSB

    Stephens

    Let's talk Saturday.
  13. TSB

    Stephens

    I've checked and can confirm that Gary Gardner is available. Problem solved.
  14. TSB

    Stephens

    Not sure that midfield is tough-tackling enough. I'd be more inclined to have Jake as backup for Beram than Dale. Not that this helps in this situation of course.
  15. TSB

    Stephens

    Same one who said he wouldn't play vs Preston (which i put on the match thread) It's not what I thought. It's what person who knows more about fitness than I thought. I believe they thought, like Naylor, that it was minor.
  16. TSB

    Stephens

    It's not that bad, no.
  17. TSB

    Stephens

    Led to believe his injury is worse than first thought. Sorry... :down:
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here