Search results

Yes that’s what I meant when I said for a while. Yes exactly I thought they were checking if the ball went out of play

You have to be behind the ball to recieve a backward pass.Is it that you come back from an offside position to get possession of the ball from a backward pass that’s in question if so then yes but it’s also been like that for a while Not sure how I’ve got involved with this nonsense🤣👍🏻

Yes that’s how it’s always been

Me too,how can that be?Surely the science behind behind the law would suggest the ball has to be moving directly forward or diagonally forward. I think the backward pass thing is someone’s opinion because I can’t Me too,so from what’s being said if we get the scenario where Mitoma breaks...

So if a player if off the pitch being treated for an injury he can still be considered one of the two defenders required between the attacking player and the goal so playing the attacker onside?