Search results

My view is Calderon and Pritchard did similar things and I don't blame either. Different to what you're saying I said

But he hadn't signed. He had indicated he would accept our terms, but then Norwich said they could beat that. Nothing wrong with it I'm sure Brighton have signed players by offering money before. Nick Forster signed as we offered him a long-term deal for example. Every player in the world will...

But he didn't have the full information when he agreed terms. He also hadn't done the medical, so all terms are dependent on that. It may leave a sour taste but if Norwich are offering £10k a week more then he would obviously go there. I would too

Because he was told about interest after those terms were agreed. Clearly.

It's worse. Pritchard was offered the chance to speak to two clubs who he has no affiliation with, and he'll likely choose the better money. Both teams have a shot at promotion this season. Calderon was offered a deal by the Albion following half a season playing for us, but chose to speak to...

So he was willing to leave us, despite being an Albion player. That's worse

Like Calderon you mean?

Norwood signed

This clearly isn't over. If he had 100% decided to go to Norwich he would have gone... dignified silence from the club is giving me hope here

Don't doubt you're right. Argus just rubbish

Argus is a pile of shite then

Not what the Argus says

Pro's for the Albion - Pritchard has worked with CH before, good facilities, more likely to play Negatives - money

He definitely wouldn't be a Stephens replacement. Stephens is generally the one who sits in front of the back four - that's not Pritchard's game at all

Hughton has always preferred 4-4-1-1 in the past, and even last season Baldock generally played off Hemed. I suspect that is the thinking if this is true