"n a report earlier this year, the Electoral Commission named Oldham West and Royton as one of the constituencies alleged to have a "greater risk" of voter fraud"
Similar to Tower Hamlets then.
Well i suppose like you, UKIP are still here. I do agree that there is a good chance that UKIP may not be about here as long as you. I did not vote for them with their longevity in mind.
Friday night drinking thread has not started yet.
By the way, i was answering the post and quote from Simster where he stated quote "even if ALL the postal votes had been for UKIP, it wouldn't have made a blind bit of difference."
Really, and after stating you would emigrate (many times) if the Tories got in at the GE, and then changing it to going traveling soon, then not so soon, and then starting up a funded business, you are still here. So who are you to doubt.
Read this post and perhaps take on board what i have...
Fair enough, but in your haste you failed to mention that the UKIP vote would go up by 7000 votes and Labour would have lLOST 7000 votes, a swing of 14000 votes, the result would change and would have made a "blind bit of difference" i'd say.
What record, it's a message board not a court of law. Just to say that after some results that had a very large amount of postal votes in comparison with the size of the constituency, and were found to be rigged, coupled with the view that the result was predicted much closer obviously the...
7,000 is a lot of postal votes in a constituency this size, i would wager that the vast vast majority were votes for Labour, sounds a bit dodgy to me. Still at least help can be given on the best place to put the cross.