Yes i know that, obviously. The evidence was conclusive, the judge gave his sentence....that should be the end in THIS particular case. Other cases may differ of course.
"Line is drawn". Surely all cases are different, this one just happened to be played out in front of millions with the murderer actually admitting it to about 6 million people that day. Fairly conclusive evidence in my book....how can you appeal against that.....in this case i mean.
Hang on, i for one did not mention vengeance, my posts on pages 2 and 4 merely mean't that in this case there should not be an appeal. I realise that in a lot of cases in fact the majority are worth an appeal. Due to the nature, the footage, the admittance and the severity of this particular...
:D...
If this murderer has to be given his right of appeal, after murdering someone in public and then proceeding to try and hack the victims head off, then for his girlfriend, parents and relatives, who not only witnessed this and the murderers boasts on camera, but have to live with...
He should get life and have no chance of wasting taxpayers money by appealing. With the tv footage and his admittance on camera, this is certainly an open and shut case......murder.