Search results

I thought he was merely pointing out that your quote suggesting we had fleeced them if we got £6.5m for him, was LAUGHABLY inaccurate. The squabble since then is mere gravy. Our biggest problem appears to be that we have replaced him with two CMS replicas and now have three labradors taking...

You think we will sell for 6.5m? No chance. Do the maths, it isn't worth us doing that.

In which case, his value to us IS his true market value.

That really doesn't make much sense. How come you think it would cost another team £6.5m to bolster their attack with Ulloa but would cost us more than that to replace him with a Leo-standard player? Surely, the way it works is that we work out how much it would cost to replace him, then...

Of course Leo is Premier class. He is better than the strikers at a third of current Premier League clubs: Neither Cardiff or Fulham have a striker as good as Ulloa. I like Whittingham, but he's looked out of his depth in the Premier league. Norwich probably have a decent striker but of...

You're being a bit picky!

Or closer to home, selling a sulking Liam Bridcutt doesn't appear to have done us much harm either.

Wood, Barnes, Vokes - all competent without looking top class. And Ulloa is FAR better than all of them.

Exactly. He's clearly Premier league class and Leicester are sensibly planning for next season with what would be a cheap option if he was honestly the difference between staying up and relegation next season. He's probably the hottest property outside the top division with the possible...

We will get a lot more than that for him if we sell. And naturally we won't sell if we somehow get promoted anyway.