Search results

Hope you had a good week. Wait..no final solution, eh? Very funny.

Don't be a knob. She's all about causing offence; if she was worried about causing offence, no one would have heard of her. More likely she was worried she'd gone a little too far this time.

You really must be joking mate. If she really meant "a solution that works" she could have said exactly that, or any number of other phrases with a similar meaning. But no. She chose the one phrase that was bound to be interpreted as a suggestion of genocide. She has a history of making...

I'm sure you won't have any trouble explaining the context. And why she changed the tweet. And why she was fired. If none of this is to do with a reference to the Holocaust. The floor is yours.

That's because it is one.

Like the war on terror, you mean? What will this one be called? "The war on terror and then some", perhaps? But no one is able to describe any plausible alternative context, either. Yes. That is what it means. If there was a "first solution" it sounds like it hasn't worked. So it wasn't a...

Ah. One of the "I'm having the last word" brigade, eh? You've had plenty of opportunity to explain what the "wider context" is, but rather than do that, you've simply asserted that there is one, and left it at that. In other words, you're a bullshitter. And please explain why having "Jewish...

Which is why she quickly altered it but got fired anyway. If she could defend a wider context I'm sure she would have done so. She didn't care to, because no such context exists.

Fair enough.

Then I'm afraid that makes you an ignoramus. Sent from my F5121 using Tapatalk

Have a word with yourself. It is an explicit reference to the Holocaust.

The God of the Old Testament, the basis of Christianity and Judaism? Not violent?

On grounds like that, you could say anyone who follows any religion is not normal. That means most of humanity is not "normal".. which must render the concept of normality meaningless.

Japan actually made peace overtures. It was Roosevelt's, and subsequently Truman's, insistence on unconditional surrender that was the obstacle. As I understand it. Totally off topic, anyway.

What do you mean by that? Muslims are not "normal people"?

I think we can see who the simpletons are for ourselves, thanks. Sent from my F5121 using Tapatalk

Indeed..as much intended for Russian consumption as anyone elses.

Struggling to see much of a connection there. I think there are arguments on both sides. Had purely military targets been used, it would be less of an issue. Japan had already been defeated.

Jews ...hmmm no autocorrect on my phone..bigears.

As a Jew, clearly not. And there is no apostrophe in "Jews". I simply think the due process of law has to be followed. Our Government agrees, so this hardly puts me beyond the pale.