Search results

Hahahaha..ahahahaha.. sorry..taxi for Mrs May. What a loser. Sent from my F5121 using Tapatalk

Success for the individual only equals success for the country of the rich pay their fair share of taxes, and pay decent wages. They don't do either of those things. They hoard money in offshore tax havens, do as much as they can to avoid paying tax, and pay workers as little as they can get...

Has "strong, stable leadership in the national interest" now been dropped?

I'm guessing you mean Stephen Hawking? Why oh why does everyone always seem to get his name wrong?

It seems odd to me that, despite the amount of flak she is getting for her stage managed appearances and failure to engage with voters, this strategy continues. Could it be that attempts to engage with voters would make her look even worse? Genuine question. What's it all about?

And she says she needs them.

They have improved enormously, as Corbyn has been effective, and May's campaign has been a shambles. I don't expect a Labour win, though.

It's odd that they seem to be doing well in the polls then, isn't it?

If May is serious about tackling extremism, this report has to come out. This could be a decisive issue.

So you managed to criticise Corbyn for not doing anything about terrorism, and for saying he will do something about terrorism, in the same post. Brilliant!

Politicians don't like the internet because it makes it easier for people to find out when they are lying.

Is being an MP not "a job in parliament" then? Sent from my F5121 using Tapatalk

Keep taking the tablets. They aren't working yet.

My father-in-law said something similar yesterday. He thinks May doesn't want to deal with Brexit and is doing her best to lose the election deliberately.

I have no evidence of what? I'm not disputing anything, am I? My evidence is the stated composition of the audience, and the argument that a representative audience would in any case be 60% or more non Conservative. You are the one saying this isn't right..but you have no evidence.

But I'm not challenging the make up of the audience, and you are. They stated how it was made up at the start. You have no evidence to say that it wasn't made up that way. I've given a solid argument as to why a fairly representative audience would be 60% or more non-Conservative voters, you've...

Based on what evidence?

Why? When it is, in fact, obviously true?

No. It isn't. Sent from my F5121 using Tapatalk

So you accept that a fairly representative audience would be 60+% non Tory voters?