As I said, if you're correct about the banning order I'd agree. Just find it odd if the local Lincoln rag (that had quotes from the court) didn't mention it if it was the case...
PS - He may be working in Oxfam on Fridays just to help out ;)
Does he actually enter the field of play though? I suppose technically he does / technically he doesn't? Happens far worse than this every week at football and not many of them will receive banning orders that I know of - certainly not 3 years...? I'm still unsure as to where he actually ended...
Again, you still don't know that. If I were to guess I'd say he wasn't on a banning order still FWIW - but I certainly don't know either way. It could have been reduced etc. If he was then I agree with you as he's again shown he is stupid. If he wasn't and the Spurs incident 7 years or so ago...
You don't know that. The order could have started from an earlier date or indeed been reduced on appeal. You'd like to think the article would mention this important fact if it was true and he was breaching. His previous offence shouldn't come into this whatsoever really. Fact is, he stood on a...