We may need cover for leftback but we have always needed that due to the rating that CH has of Chicksen.
If our Left back cover was only really 4th choice behind our 2nd choice right back and 3rd choice right back then he should have been replaced in the summer.
As far as I'm concerned we're...
Why do we need a replacement for a player who never had a run in the side or rarely made the bench even after the only other recognised players in his position were out injured.
That would be like bringing in a replacement for Ankergren