Chelsea are only attractive due to the money chucked in all directions. You do realise until the Russian bought your club you were a mid table non-entity. A run down stadium which to this day is far behind most over top clubs in England. Yes your club keeps printing new pictures of your...
Interesting, Lamptey and Gilmour both decided Brighton were a better option having both turned down a new contract with Chelsea. Colwell as well wanted to come but Chelsea have chucked a load of dosh his way to stay.
So now you're saying our chairman is cheap yet he's turning down your club's money as he doesn't need it. There's no logic in your argument.
He happens to be a multi billionaire by the way.
We don't value our players, our owner does and that's all that counts.
Everything else is subjective crap.
The bleating of Burberry chavs will be of no consequence
Again I appreciate what you posted but Naylor stated previously that Bloom has requested full payment previously. I'll try to find the article, I believe it was a Q and A session he held on the Athletic where he stated we received full payment on the contract signing.
Typically initial upfront...
I appreciate that, Chelsea have been offering 8 year contracts so they can spread the cost on their accounts, that's been stopped.
The point still stands Bloom will want the majority of the fee upfront. It's something Naylor has stated regarding previous transfers out, Trossard and Mac Alister...
The other factor that you alluded to was Chelsea want to dodge FFP in the short term by paying over a stupid period and long contracts. A stop has been put to that and indeed Bloom will want a huge chunk upfront.
Your book is outdated