Search results

Maybe and it's a valid point. But as supporters we can only judge what we see, which this season has not been good enough.

Yes I thought he was ok as I have stated, I thnk I rated him 7 in the ratings. But if he was as big as influence as some on this thread think he would not have been sacrificed. He could have been shifted more central.

Sorry Mellotron, but no way was he very good, he was ok, which is why he was withdrawn. He was however, very good when he set Conway up, ?Blackburn, thought he was on his way back then.

Funny because his inability to deliver and lack of defensive nous has probably cost the same! Seriously, you can produce as many stats as you like, but rarely do they tell the whole story and the is another classic case.

MoM? Really? Other than the penalty at Millwall he was dire, hopeless Hull away, ok but not great vs Wigan and poor Saturday. Is Saturday really counted as an assist (serious question), it was stupid defending.

Interestingly I'm in 1901 and never moaned at Barnes because he gave 100%. Even the red cards were largely down to his desire to win. Spanish Dave, different player granted, does not have that desire, and as the Complete Badger has highlighted, every 'fan', even those in 1901 can spot someone...

How many of his mistakes have cost us games / inability to deliver. Whilst he was ok last season, he has been very poor this season.

Great response Acker, but really my point is that we can produce attacking stats, but defending comes from the front as well and all players have a responsibility. The days of the playmaker are all but gone, players need to be athletes and be able to create and tackle back, you only have to...

Acker, as you know I love the stats you produce, but as a midfield player albeit a wide one, for an accurate picture we should have stats on tackles made, times being pulled out of position, not tracking back, ball watching, over-hit deliveries, corners where the first man is not cleared...