Search results

You first suggested that those who want safe-standing are labouring under the delusion that it will be a return to terracing - in my experience they know exactly what rail seating is and some don't even remember terracing because they are aged 18-30. You then stated that, amex or not, the days...

You'd need to encapsulate the area in anti-grav to fall over a rail seat.

I think it's quite obvious that this thread was made considering what was reported by PB as limited interest, to ask those that are ACTUALLY INTERESTED IN STANDING whether they would pay more for their ST/Tickets to jusitfy the outlay from the club. Instead it has turned into a bunch of people...

That's great, padded seating means nothing to me. Another one that has no interest in standing, yet votes on a poll asking if they'd pay more to stand. Genius.

Are you interested in standing?

Also, this poll should read 'If you are interested in safe-standing, would you pay £5 extra' as it seems most that have voted would not even want to stand which is perplexing :rolleyes:

I don't want a return to terracing. I want to be able to stand at home matches. Sounds like exactly what I do at nearly all away games. Are padded seats a waste of time and money? I wonder if we had a poll now about the potential of adding this luxury, how many would say it's a worthwhile...

It's deemed unsafe, irrespective of what you and I think.

Prefer the unsafe standing we already have then?

Really? I always thought the majority on here were not interested. I know plenty that are.

Seriously hope that is not the case. I read it as lack of interest in the surveys themselves, I didn't even know there were 2 of them.

Yep.