Search results

We don't 'cover' losses, they are part of the losses :facepalm: You are cheats because you broke the rules laid out that (most) other clubs adhered to. Rules that we have not broken and will not break. Are you a bit dim? For instance, there are no rules that state a rich local owner cannot...

That's not a statement of fact, just an outside opinion. The club's official line was that we are within the permitted rolling 13M losses. Speculate more if you like by quoting 30M (the figure seems to keep going up) losses and what must be a couple billion debt now it's been through the social...

Football is ****ed up, that's a different point. Manchester City and Chelsea were permitted to rise before these rules came into place which restricts other clubs from doing the same with rich owners. Therefore if there were no rules then they couldn't have cheated any, and other rich owners...

Our goal was promotion, once that was achieved (before anyone else) our players switched off after being through 2 gruelling seasons, and still it took a 90th minute bobbler and a GK error for us to miss out on the title. If that's the ammunition that clubs will throw at us next season then...

Yes, Brighton and Hove Albion..we're dodgy as fook :facepalm::tumble:

???:wozza:

Certainly if you continue to argue with parody accounts.

Maybe. The PL is so devoid of interesting fixtures I guess at least 2 would be covered each season.