This is a great debate and will rumble on - but there's another angle I'm not sure has been discussed yet. Does Keogh not have ground to sue either Bennett or Lawrence or both?
Which is a reasonable argument and I'm sure they'll make the case that, as the captain and the most experienced player in the group, he should have set a better example. I'm sure they're as confident about their reasoning and justification as the Albion were when Gus got the bullet. But looking...
But that is spectacularly not the point. The man has a contract and has been treated totally differently from the other players involved in the incident. It's not "whataboutism" to say that they set precedent by fining Bennett and Lawrence, and have treated Keogh completely differently by...