Search results

And this is the point which I think a lot of people contributing to this thread have missed. Yes, there are arguments over why the Towers fell, and you can debate what hit the Pentagon all day long but the really interesting stuff is from the year(s) beforehand, the Project for the New American...

The woman herself doesn't contest that the building was still standing when they were reporting it had fallen. This isn't something which is debatable, you can look it up independently and verify it's true. The woman herself has spoken about it, there's not a debate about whether it was still...

Nonsense. Absolute nonsense. Fair. Well, I think all the events of 9/11 are public as well. But without someone putting them together, it's hard to connect all the points and I know that not everyone has spent the hours I have researching the whole thing and attempting to understand the...

She was there, it was a live shot and she was in New York. The BBC weren't the only ones reporting on the collapse before it had actually happened, you can find all this on YouTube. It's probable that there was a wire story which is why they were all picking up on it but the point is that the...

I've watched everything. Some things are more reliable than others and when you're talking in theoretics, you're only ever going to end up with arguments and counter arguments being made. Based on everything I've seen and read, and I've looked at evidence from both sides, I don't believe the...

To keep the thread to a reasonable level I've removed the pictures and video. You say "science explains why the buildings collapsed as they did" and then post a video of a computer generated simulation. That isn't science. Also, "quite easily explained too" is a ridiculous comment. I'm not...

Gullible would be the rejection of all the facts and evidence and believing the official story, which is full of holes, inconsistencies and incomplete in that it doesn't address key points. I've read the whole thing, and I've read numerous other books as well as watching all of the YouTube...

Is that supported by anything? Have you seen the videos pointing out the expulsions from all corners of the buildings as they collapse? Global collapse on that scale was not seen before 9/11 and it hasn't been seen since. The reality is that nobody has sufficiently been able to explain the...

I've formed my opinions based on the evidence I've seen and read. I reject some of the things mentioned, holograms instead of planes for example - that one loses me. But it's interesting to me as well that hove born&bred spoke about the insurance policy because that's one of my call outs from...

I was going to see if anyone had quoted that one, gas explosion causing a partial collapse is perfectly understandable scientifically. Grenfell not falling, even slightly, is also explained scientifically but building 7 is not only not explained, but NIST gave up trying to and ended up being...